← hongwealth.ai
Sample report · composite family · figures illustrative

Client Investment & Financial Review — the Tan family.

Prepared forMr & Mrs Tan, both 56 (composite profile)
Household2 children (23 & 21) · 1 dependent sibling
Review basisFull fact-find & portfolio mark-to-market

"Dear Mr & Mrs Tan — thank you for the recent review. This report summarises your overall financial position: your investments and income, your insurance coverage, your CPF position, and the actions we agreed. Where a figure is not guaranteed, it is clearly labelled."

1

Your Investment Portfolio

Three decades of disciplined investing, marked to market and consolidated across every account — including the ones each of you manages separately.

Investable assets
HoldingWhere heldMarket value (SGD)
Singapore equities (30+ holdings)Brokerage — his & hers~2,600,000
Regional & US equitiesBrokerage~250,000
SGD corporate bondBank custody~150,000
Unit trust portfolioWrap account~80,000
Fixed deposits & savingsBanks~720,000
Total investable assets~3,800,000

Home, investment property, CPF balances and insurance policies are shown separately. Detailed holding-level analysis sits in the clients' full portfolio workbook — deliberately not published here.For more information on CPF accounts, CPF LIFE and nominations, visit cpf.gov.sg ↗

Portfolio income
SourceEst. amount (SGD/yr)Guaranteed?
Dividends across equity holdings~66,000No — companies set dividends yearly
Bond coupon~4,000Coupon fixed; issuer credit
Total vs their SGD 14,000/mth household target~70,000covers only ~40% of target

The SGD 14,000/mth target is the couple's own lifestyle (~SGD 10,000) plus lifelong monthly support for Mr Tan's dependent sibling (~SGD 4,000). Both spouses still draw salaries today, which cover the household until their planned retirement at 60 — the shortfall below is what retirement would look like without action. The blended dividend yield is modest (~2.3%) because much of the equity book sits in growth names that pay little; the income that does arrive is concentrated in the three banks.

Where the dividend income comes from

~85%from three local banks
Three local banks ~85%
All other holdings ~15%

Asset allocation

Direct equities
~75%
Cash & fixed deposits
~19%
Bonds & unit trusts
~6%
…of equities, in Singapore
~90%
Two findings that mattered: the portfolio's income covers barely 40% of what this household needs — including the sibling's lifelong care — and about 85% of that income is paid by just three companies in one industry. History says the realistic risk isn't those dividends going to zero — it's all three being cut 40–60% at once in a downturn, for a year or two. Both findings point the same way: a layer of guaranteed retirement income that doesn't depend on the market or on any company's yearly decision. (The specific moves are set out in Section 5.)
2

Your Insurance Coverage

Every policy in the household, translated into what it actually does for the family — not what the brochure calls it.

Policies in force
PolicyWhat it does for youStatus
Retirement income plan — hisPays a monthly income from age 60 to 70, then a final lump sumIn force · fully paid
Retirement income plan — hersGuaranteed + non-guaranteed monthly income from age 70; extra payout if unable to perform daily activitiesIn force
Universal life legacy policy (USD)Whole-of-life, 7-figure death benefit — the estate & trust funding vehicleIn force
Whole life policyLifelong cover with bonusesExploring paid-up option
Private Integrated Shield plans ×2 + co-pay ridersPrivate hospitalisation for both, with capped out-of-pocketIn force

Non-guaranteed benefits depend on future insurer performance and are not guaranteed. Specific insurers, sums and premiums are shown only in the client's own report.

Coverage adequacy — the honest scorecard
Protection layerPositionVerdict
Life / legacy cover7-figure liquidity for the estate and the trustOK
HospitalisationPrivate plans held personally, both spousesOK
Critical illnessNo standalone CI — liquid assets self-insure treatment costsLow · optional
Long-term careCare income starts only from 70 — possible gap before thenMedium · to review
Retirement incomeDividends cover ~40% of the household's needs; even with existing plans + CPF LIFE, income never reaches the target at any ageGap · plan proposed
Note what a real review does: it names what's already enough and what genuinely isn't. Three of five layers needed no action at all — but the retirement-income layer had a real gap, and that is where the recommendation went.
3

Your CPF Position

The quiet, government-backed layer of the plan — checked account by account for both spouses.

Combined household CPF
AccountBalance (SGD)Key point
Ordinary Account~500,000Earning 2.5% guaranteed — currently beating T-bills and fixed deposits, so it stays put
Retirement Accounts~450,000Both met the Full Retirement Sum at 55 — CPF LIFE payouts are secured for life, for each of them
MediSave~150,000Near the Basic Healthcare Sum — premiums payable from here
One item needed attention: their CPF nominations named only each other — but their will provides for the children and for Mr Tan's dependent sibling. CPF savings don't pass under a will. If the difference is deliberate, fine — but it must be confirmed deliberately, with contingent nominees added. This is exactly the kind of quiet mismatch a full review exists to catch.

For more information on CPF accounts, CPF LIFE and nominations, visit cpf.gov.sg ↗

4

Your Financial Plan at a Glance

Every income stream, by the age it switches on — versus the SGD 14,000/mth the household actually needs (the couple's ~10,000 lifestyle plus ~4,000 lifelong support for the sibling).

SGD 14k/mth target
~$5.8k
Now · 56
~$6.6k
From 60
~$9.8k
From 65
~$10.9k
From 70
Dividends & coupon
Retirement plan (60–70)
CPF LIFE ×2 (from 65)
Second plan (from 70)
Income by source, across retirement stages (SGD/mth, illustrative)
Income sourceNow (56)From 60From 65From 70Guaranteed?
Stock dividends~5,500~5,500~5,500~5,500No — set yearly
Bond coupon~330~330~330~330Fixed; issuer credit
Retirement income plan — his800800ends → lump sumYes (60–70)
CPF LIFE — both (est.)~3,200~3,200Lifelong; may adjust
Retirement income plan — hers~1,900Part guaranteed
Total vs SGD 14,000/mth target~5,800~6,600~9,800~10,900gap at every stage

CPF LIFE shown at conservative planning floor across two payouts; actual figures likely higher as interest accrues. All non-guaranteed projections may be higher or lower; CPF LIFE payouts may be adjusted by CPF Board.For more information on CPF accounts, CPF LIFE and nominations, visit cpf.gov.sg ↗

The gap the numbers reveal: from now until 65 this family runs SGD 7,400–8,200/mth short of what the household needs — and even with every existing stream switched on, they remain SGD 3,000–4,200/mth short for life. No existing plan closes it. That is why the central recommendation of this review is an additional retirement income / annuity layer: guaranteed lifelong income that closes the gap, lifts the floor for life, and doesn't move with the market. (The exact moves — and how they close the gap at every age — are set out in Section 5.)
Key milestones
WhenMilestone
Next 12 monthsSon graduates; daughter decides on her Master's abroad — education monies ring-fenced either way
Age 60Planned retirement — salaries stop; first retirement income plan, the recommended annuity and the bridge ladder all switch on
Age 65CPF LIFE begins for both — the guaranteed floor under everything
Age 70Second plan begins + first plan pays its final lump sum
5

Your Goals & Concerns — and What We Recommend

Everything in this report ultimately serves the goals this family set and the concerns they shared. Here is each one, where they stand, and the direction agreed.

Goals
Their goalWhere they standDirection agreed
"Let the investments do the work" — SGD 10,000/mth for themselves + SGD 4,000/mth for the sibling, without sellingNot yet — dividends and coupons cover only ~40% of the household's needs, and most of that is non-guaranteedAdd a guaranteed retirement income / annuity layer to close the gap for life — and diversify where the remaining income comes from
Launch both children — further study + first-home helpIntentions clear, monies not yet ring-fencedSet aside dedicated sums now so gifts happen on purpose, not from whatever's left over
Provide for Mr Tan's dependent sibling — for lifeProvided for in the will, but a one-time lump sum won't protect him over the years — and would land on the children to manageOur strongest recommendation: a Special Needs Trust with a letter of intent, funded by the legacy policy's liquidity — managed care, not a burden passed down
Concerns — including two they hadn't raised themselves
ConcernWhy it mattersDirection agreed
"If one of us goes first"The survivor must stay secure and the sibling stay funded — without force-selling good assets at a bad momentThe legacy policy supplies immediate liquidity; the portfolio never has to be touched
No Lasting Powers of Attorney (our flag)Without LPAs, neither spouse — nor the children — can step in without a court processRegister both LPAs this quarter: inexpensive, quick, and the single most important gap found
Income relies on three dividend payers (our flag)One industry's payout decisions directly set this family's monthly budgetAdd income sources that don't depend on bank dividends — structure discussed privately with the clients
Nominations vs will don't matchCPF and policy monies flow by nomination, not by the will — good intentions can misfireAlign every nomination deliberately; add contingent nominees
Closing the income gap — the recommended purchases
MoveIndicative amount (SGD)What it delivers
1 · Top up both CPF Retirement Accounts to the Enhanced Retirement Sum~430,000
transferred from OA — no cash outlay
Lifts CPF LIFE from ~3,200 to ~6,600/mth combined from 65 — government-backed, for life. The single best "safe income" value available
2 · Single-premium lifetime annuity (income from 60)~400,000
from fixed deposits
~1,900/mth for life from 60 — part guaranteed, part non-guaranteed; doesn't depend on markets or bank dividends
3 · Five-year bridge ladder (short endowments / FDs / T-bills)~320,000
from fixed deposits
Draws ~5,500/mth from 60 to 65 — covers the years after salaries stop but before CPF LIFE begins
Income with the plan in place60–65: ~14,000 · 65–70: ~15,100 · 70+: ~16,200 — target covered at every stage

Funded entirely from CPF OA (~430k of ~500k) and fixed deposits (~720k) — not one share is sold. Salaries until 60 rebuild the cash buffer; ~70k stays in OA as reserve. Plan types and amounts are generic and indicative; specific products, insurers and rates belong to the client's own report.For more information on CPF accounts, CPF LIFE and nominations, visit cpf.gov.sg ↗

The legal & estate plan — recommended alongside the purchases
InstrumentWhat it doesWhy it can't wait
1 · Lasting Powers of Attorney — both spousesEach appoints the other (and a contingent donee) to act if mental capacity is lostWithout an LPA, even a spouse needs a court deputyship to step in — slow, costly, public
2 · Special Needs Trust + Letter of IntentHolds and manages the sibling's ~4,000/mth care for life, with documented care wishes; funded on death by the universal life policy's proceedsA lump-sum bequest would land on the children to administer for decades — a trust makes the care automatic, managed and protected
3 · Wills, CPF & policy nominations — alignedUpdated wills for both spouses; CPF nominations with contingent nominees; every policy's nomination checked against the willCPF and nominated policy monies bypass the will — today the documents contradict each other

For more information on CPF accounts, CPF LIFE and nominations, visit cpf.gov.sg ↗

In short: the portfolio is strong, but the income it produces isn't enough — or guaranteed enough — to retire on. Three purchases close the income gap for life without selling a single share, and three legal instruments make sure the plan survives whatever happens to whom, first.
6

Agreed Action Items

Every review ends the same way: a short, owned, dated list — so the plan actually happens.

  1. Transfer ~SGD 430,000 from OA to both Retirement Accounts — top up to the Enhanced Retirement Sum
  2. Place the ~SGD 400,000 single-premium lifetime annuity — income from 60, quotes to be compared across insurers
  3. Build the ~SGD 320,000 five-year bridge ladder — short endowments / FDs / T-bills covering ages 60–65
  4. Register Lasting Powers of Attorney — both spouses, with contingent donees
  5. Set up the Special Needs Trust with a Letter of Intent for the dependent sibling; legal advice arranged
  6. Update both wills and align CPF & policy nominations; add contingent nominees
  7. Ring-fence the children's education and first-home sums
  8. Confirm long-term-care coverage status and quote the supplement option

This is what a full review looks like.
Curious what yours would say?

Portfolio, insurance, CPF, estate — one picture, honestly assessed. The Tans' report ran far deeper than this sample; yours would too.

Book a complimentary review →